
[Daily Automated AI Summary]
Notice: This post has been automatically generated and does not reflect the views of the site owner, nor does it claim to be accurate. Possible consequences of current developments ICCV Desk Rejecting Papers Because Co-Authors Did Not Submit Their Reviews Benefits: This approach may ensure a higher quality of peer review, as it places responsibility on all co-authors to contribute, potentially leading to more thorough evaluations. It could enhance accountability within research teams and promote a culture of collaborative effort in the review process....